Memorial Day

Two days of training for Borough Secretaries- Administrators ended on Thursday afternoon. I attended the last Westmoreland County Association of Boroughs meeting until September Thursday night.  I spent a several hours this holiday weekend reading back issues of the magazine Borough News.

The most important thing that is happening in Delmont is tomorrow 10:00 AM at Twin Valley Memorial Park. It is the service where we thank all who serve and especially honor the men and women who paid the ultimate price serving in the armed services to protect our Freedoms.  It really use to bother me when I see people disrespect, destroy, or burn our Flag because I always thought about those who gave their life for this Country, and those who put themselves in harm's way defending our way of life. Now, I just feel sorry that those people who engage in such activities are so ignorant that they don't realize they are destroying the symbol of all the people who fought and died to give them the ability to express these views publicly.

From the bottom of my heart a most sincere thanks to all who died that I may live in Freedom today: to the families that had to endure the loss of loved ones: and, those who have suffered great personal, mental, and physical losses in service to our Nation. Thanks to all who serve. God Bless you one and all.

Update May 24, 2016

I am waiting for the start of two day administration class.

I met with my advisor-Mentor for three hours last Wednesday. He gave me great advice.  I have started to act on some of it, but there is still so much to do.

I am going to the County Association of Boroughs tomorrow night. I am very interested in the speaker who is the Director of Emergency response. There have not been many comments or responses to the post I made about gas pipeline explosion.  I heard that there may now be ground water contamination. I can't wait to discuss some issues with the other County leaders.

I have been meeting with Scouting leaders about reestablishing Cub Pack. There is a new part to Cub Scout Program called Lions.  It is pilot program for Kindergarten age 5 boys. Not only looking into this piolet program but looking into having a special needs Den.

Responded to some residents on storm water issues, but haven't got the response hoping.

Any concerns, feel free to contact me. It is a pleasure serving you.

Gas Pipeline Explosion

Many of you who are citizens of Delmont Borough may be wondering why I would include this post under Delmont Council Activities.  I hope all of you are aware prior to my election to Council the Borough granted easements to Sunoco for the Mariner 2 Pipeline to pass through our Borough.  My original position is there is not much that can be done with pipelines because these are Federally Regulate and the transmission of oil and gas throughout the Country can be claimed a National Security issue.  When I attempted to attend the Town Hall Meeting in Salem Township when I arrived there was no room to even enter the building.  There was an activist there who tried to tell me that new lines could be fought because there is enough infrastructure to support movement now that the oil and gas companies just want their own lines so they don't have to pay to use what is there.  I have not researched enough to comment on that claim, but it was interesting.  I even talked a little bit with one of Keith Rothfus staff members about some of what you will find in this post.

When I went to the meeting I was not overly interested in what the Gas company was saying about the incident.  My personal belief is that the information would be rudimentary at best and most of the "information" would be Public Relations sophistry to convenience everyone of how safe gas and oil pipelines are.  I just wanted to formally request a copy of the official NTSB report that would have all the facts in it.  The NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board) is the Agency responsible for regulating the oil and gas lines.

Here is a list of my personal beliefs in case you feel that I am becoming too biased.

1. We all use either gas, oil, or both.  If we want these services the lines have to go somewhere. Nobody really wants them in their backyards.
2. In this incident the safety procedures worked well because the gas was shut off fairly quickly and there was no loss of life and limited damage compared to what could have been.
3. This incident should act as a wake up call to all the people who have fracking wells on their property or who are considering allowing wells on their property.  Yes, I know a transmission line is not the same as a fracking well but explosions and fires are possible at wells.  Why do you think they offer what seems like so much money when they are trying to start?
4. When any pipe is laid the company has a good idea of how long that pipe is going to last, but they make no effort to put money aside for replacement because they rather raise rates when the infrastructure needs to be updated.
5. Oil and Gas companies employ large numbers of actuaries to calculate the costs of damage and loss of life from accidents.  Sadly in some cases they may take the risk that leads to loss of life and property because it is so unlikely or would be cheaper to pay for it at some future time.
6. There is very little if anything that can be done to change locations of current pipelines.

I am not a big fan of more rules or regulations; however, when the bureaucracy is already in place and the life and property of citizens in our Commonwealth and Nation are in danger, it becomes necessary to make changes.  Yes, the gas and oil industry are in a bit of a slump right now, and some of the cost will probably filter down to us in higher utility bills because that is how the industry deals with cost increases.

Here is a list of points that I believe should be incorporated into Pennsylvania law at a minimum.  I would encourage all citizens to contact their State Senators and Representatives to push these initiatives.

1. If PA is going to be a major player in the Oil and Gas Industry the companies who are utilizing our resources ought to establish a HellFire response base somewhere in the central part of our state.  Gas and oil fires are special fire circumstances and beyond the capabilities of local fire departments.  We were lucky that the gas was able to be turned off.  Next time we may not be so lucky.  A lot of death and destruction is possible within the four plus hours it would take for the fire fighters to immobilize from Texas.  From a central location in PA it would be 2 hours max to respond to an incident within the State.
2. There should be accident scenarios developed for homes,farms, and business that could be damaged or destroyed by pipeline and well accidents to include worse case possible.  The results should be shared with the citizens that live in or have a business in those areas.
3. Gas and Oil lines are a necessary part of life.and they have risks no matter how small they may be.  In real estate transfers major pipe and well locations should be disclosed immediately along with the accident scenario so buyers can make informed choices if they want to assume the risk.  We make choices about risk everyday in driving and flying on airplanes.  Property owners have the same rights to make choices.
4. Gas and oil companies ought to be required to set monies aside for infrastructure repair to pipelines.  They know how much service life to expect.  Although these costs will eventually be passed on to the consumer, it will prevent the rate increases in the twelfth hour to ensure safe service.
5. The companies ought to be required to set up a found for people killed and property destroyed by pipeline and well accidents.  They may make safer decisions if they have large sums of their own money at stake instead of relying on insurance companies to pay all damages.

These are the points that I wanted to cover at the meeting.  Your comments are appreciated.
    .

Storm Water Post

Attention:  Residents of Delmont.  The weather has been wet and rainy.  Are you having trouble with storm water runoff?  The problems of interest include:  flooding basement (or large amounts of water in basement), water accumulation on driveways and sidewalks, and large amounts of water accumulating in yards.  The Westmoreland County Conservation District is interested in accumulating data and offering assistance in correcting these problems.  Delmont and some surrounding areas have been given a priority status because of development and location.  I have joined the Integrated Water Resource Plan (IWRP) Committee.  One task is to collect the address locations of problem areas in our Borough.  Depending on the severity of the problem, or multiple complaints in one area a representative of the Westmoreland County Conservation District will visit and give ideas of how to correct your problems.  There is no cost to you for the visit and advice.  You will also be provided a copy of the 25 page booklet  Southwestern Pennsylvania’s Homeowner’s Guide to Storm water: How to develop and implement a stormwater management plan for your property.  Please provide name, address or tax plot number, and a description of the problem.  Also, indicate if you want to try to set up an appointment with the representative of Westmoreland County Conservation District.

Please send information or direct questions to Councilman David Piper. E-mail david4delmont@gmail.com.  Send to the Delmont Borough Office: 77 Greensburg St. Delmont, PA 15626.  You can call (724) 552-9531.

Thoughts from Council Meeting May 10,2016

Sorry it took so long to write this but we had a visitor this week.  I am so glad that the Delmont Library lease was signed and project will go on without delay.  I was afraid that after the note was read we would be hit with a delay pending yet another meeting.  I wanted so bad to make the motion to approve the lease and move on, but I knew if the first motion came from me that would not happen.  That is why I jumped on and seconded it as fast as I could.  Other than this there was not a whole lot of issues that were very important that were handled.  I did want to ask the insurance committee if they even asked for a quote from Keystone Insurers Group.  One thing that I have learned from my trainings is this group is endorsed by the Pennsylvania State Association of Boroughs and they provide free quotes.  Often they are less expensive because they specialize in Borough insurances.  If their quote would have been lower at least Delmont could have shown it to the group we choose and tried to negotiate a comparable rate.  But what do I know, I am the junior member.

There are many issues weighing heavily on my mind.  When the cheaper route is chosen the cost savings is immediate, but the potential future liabilities are much more costly.  The other thing that is bothering me is I am not sure whether our solicitor was just testing me or if he thinks that I am just ignorant about the law.  Sure he doesn't know that I took the LSATS or that I was considering being a lawyer at one point, or that I tutored Law students at the University of Maryland when I lived down in that part of the country.  I suppose I could spend the $200,000 to get the JD after my name, but I am going to spend $90,000 instead pursuing a Masters in Environmental Mgt/Public Policy that will be more beneficial to Delmont, Westmoreland County, and perhaps the State in the long run.  Especially in the issues of MS4, Stormwater, and sewage.

Fortunately, I am meeting with one of my advisers next Wednesday and hope to get insights on how to proceed.  Not only will these deficiencies increase cost on our budget, but it will alienate fellow council members and the Mayor.  I want so desperately to build a working relationship with everyone, but continuous operation outside the law carries a lot of potential liability for our community.  Furthermore, some of the areas were we have not been operating proceduraly  correct, don't carry legal and fiduciary consequences, but it has harmed our little community greatly.  It will continue to be detrimental if not corrected.  I am currently seeking funds, privately, that will address some of the deficiencies but there will be long term costs associated with it as well.

I would support a community wide meeting were all of the residents of Delmont could meet with the full council and vote on the services that we as a community feel our in our best interest.  Yes, there are some expenses that are mandated by laws (Sewage, Storm water MS4, Civil Service Commission with more than 3 full time officers), but there are other areas where, I feel, your voices should be heard.  However, everyone must understand the costs of providing services continues to increase and our tax base has remained fairly stagnate.  It is impossible to provide services without some sort of tax increases.  That is why I think it is vitally important for you to tell us how, and how much you are willing to pay for the services that are important to you and your families.  As you know from a previous post I am not a fan of paying higher taxes or fees either, but someone has to pay.  Cutting corners, keeping fees artificially low makes everyone happy today by the money that is being saved, but at some point somebody will need to pay.

I am going to make a post about storm water project that I am involved in and one about the piipeline explosion.  Thank you for the opportunity to serve.        

Sewer Rates Part 2

Sorry it has been so many days, I have been extremely busy in trainings and meetings to better serve you.  I will give a detail at some point if you wish, but I need to get back to the major post at hand.

I realize that 80% of you probably don't care about all the background information that I am putting into these blogs, but you have a right to know, because 100% of us are affected by increasing costs.

It is a sad fact that of all the taxes and fees we pay to the different government entities (Federal, State,County, etc) the most bang we get for our bucks is in local services.  In fact, one theme that was stressed repeatedly in many trainings is Local Government exists to provide services. Services continue to increase in costs and complexity thanks to many non-funded mandates that we receive on the local level.  For those who are not familiar with the phrase "non-funded mandates" these are laws and regulations that we must enforce that cost local governments lots of money, but no money is given from the Feds or state to pay for them.  The consequence more of your local money is diverted and you aren't seeing any service benefits.

Other trends that are happening throughout the County is many communities are hitting the wall.  I have heard many retired complaining about having to live on a fix income.  I can empathize with the sentiment, but a fixed income is what an individual is going to get when relying on Government to take care of them.  "Equally" dividing the pie does not take into account individual needs which vary greatly.  It may come as a shock, but local government runs on a fixed income as well.  It is called the local tax base and the citizens abilities to pay the taxes and fees.  Interestingly enough it seems the only level of government that gives relief in economic challenging times is the local governments.  Local governments are least likely to be able to afford it.  You probably forgot but several years ago the rates that Delmont was being charged increased, but Delmont did not raise the rates.  One year Delmont even cut back the rate.  This is very popular and the citizens are very happy. Nobody wants to pay more for sewage than necessary.  But this leads more to the way people think about money than charges for services.

Money is a strange thing.  Personally, I hate spending money on Social Security tax, and Unemployment tax, hair cuts, like to eat well hate spending on food, clothes and shoes wrap up the short list.  I bulk and complain a bit about $105 dues for an organization I love and will turn around and spend $125 for a music installment for kids lessons.  I don't mind spending money for Philanthropy, books, personal education and growth, good food and service at restaurants, travel with family.  The point is we all have our own comfort zone and likes about how we spend money.  I doubt taxes, sewage, or utilities would make anybody's list of favorite expenditures, but where would we be without them?

In 2013, I think was the year, that Gallop studied how many family's actually have a budget.  There finding was 1 in 3.  To me that seems like it might be a little high, but that means that three of your Council members ought to be good at budgeting.  Well, there is another list I didn't quit make, but I am learning.

I have come up with an analogy of our current sewer situation.  Delmont was not the only government entity that could be described by this scenario. It also describes what many sewer authorities have done.  It is this kind of thinking that I believe has lead to the bankruptcy of the Pittsburgh Serwer authority as well.   Nobody anywhere likes to pay for this service.  It must be viewed as just throwing money down the drain, but it is not.  Modern conveniences have spoiled us.  We set our garbage out and it disappears.  We flush our toilets, out of sight out of mind.

Now here is the analogy:  We passed an ordinance where we provide a Prime cut Steak for $2.00 a day as a service for our citizens.  We get a 25 year contract where the full price is paid at the end. Everybody is thrilled they get to eat stead everyday for only $730.00 a year what a bargain. For the first 5 years the cost is $2.00 a day but those in power decide it has been a good yer so to make the citizens happy they reduce the fee to $1.50 for the next 5 years.  The powers realize that the price is going up and there are only 10 years left rates need to go up.  After much fighting and public comment the fee is back up to $1.75.  There are only five years left.  The community is out raged but fee is raised to $6.00. To keep it simple we will say that the real cost of the stake to the government was $10.00 and did not go up a cent for 25 years.  Yes, this is totally unrealistic but it is sufficient to make the point.  The cost per person for the full 25 years is $91,250.00.  The total money collected to pay for it is $31,481.25.  The amount still owed would be $59,768.75 per person.  Where is that money suppose to come from?  Government's role is to provide the services not make up for any short falls.  Remember with proper budgeting and fee structures there would not be that big of a deficit.  Ideally, there is a zero balance or what is necessary for emergencies of some infrastructure a surplus. Very few residents would be able to pay the 59,768.95 in one year, so the powers that be would have to come up with a payment plan of probably another 25 years so that the residents could afford the extra fee in addition to current tax and fee obligations.  The steak fee would be $2,390.76 every year for 25 years and that would not be giving them new steak everyday.  Everyone enjoyed having that steak everyday, but who would want to pay for it for 25 years long after the memory of satisfaction is gone?  Fine people of Delmont, we have been "eating steak" so to speak for about 40 years and the bill is coming due.

I want to make a comment about "surpluses" when it comes to things like sewage treatment.  Many people think if there is money that is not being spent that tax breaks should follow.  For instance if I had $50,000 just sitting in the sewer account some people would be outraged that they were still paying so much for their sewage.  Delmont trying to make a profit at our expense.  The reality is equipment for sewage is extremely costly.  If a pump would go that "surplus" is only one third of what would be needed to replace it.  That's right sitting on $50,000 it still might be necessary to borrow another $100.000 just to keep sewage moving.

The realities I want to warn you about are we are going to probably need to borrow money to stabilize the budget with the upgrade that happened at the Pump station.  Secondly, sewage rates are probably going to need to be increased.  It is ironic that the Councilman with a whopping 5 months under his belt could have done so much wrong in such a short period of time.  I assure you that I have the same amount of accountability, responsibility, and culpability for this situation that I have for other situations in history like the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the sinking of the Titanic, and the Hindenburg disaster.  There are some who will try to get you to perceive otherwise.Please know that I am going to do my best to soften the blows that are on the horizon.  Believe me there are a lot more coming and I am spending about 3 hours a day trying to think through some of this issues.  I am not sure that all the money I am spending this year will give me enough information to solve all these issues, but it should give the basis for ideas.  I truly hope that I can encourage fellow council members to work cooperatively toward objectives that are truly good for Delmont.  My oppositions arise when I don't feel that the people of Delmont are not being heard or discounted, when the actions are against what constituents told me, or I believe that the action is for now and not the long term interest of our community.

As always feel free to contact me.  It is a pleasure serving you.    

Increasing Sewer Rates??????

One of the "benefits" of being elected to any type of public service office is becoming a punching bag and excuse for everything that happens.  In the coming weeks, perhaps months there are going to be many accusations and complaints about all the stuff that Piper guy did to increase rates, raise taxes, spend recklessly, ruin the standard of living, and the list may go on.  I have already received an e-mail from a fellow council person who is blaming the Sewer Committee for the budget problem.  So, it is important that you are aware of some facts before all of the "facts" as perceived from other members start coming out in discussions trying to pin all the problems on the new guy on the block.

1.  Delmont Council took out a tax anticipation loan at least one year before I was even a member.  What this means is the Borough did not have enough money to end the year without borrowing.  According to some other municipal officials I have met in my trainings this is a bad thing because it means the budget was done incorrectly and the government is spending more money than it is bringing in.

2. Our current budget was prepared before I took office.  I had absolutely no input, which is ok because quit frankly I don't have enough experience, or education on preparing a budget.  As part of my promise to you I have signed up for a budgeting course, but it isn't offered until September 7,2016. This is before next year's budget is due, but that is not helpful to me at this point.  I do have another class this Saturday which is part of Newly Elected Borough Officials Boot camp which will give me some information on Borough finances.  I received some information on where to get the best prices for needed equipment and supplies in the Public Works Management class I took on March 10th.  I will receive some more information on May 25&26 when I attend Your Role as Municipal Secretary Administrator class.I may even gain some budgeting insights at the conference I am attending June 5-8.  In the matter of full disclosure there is an opportunity for the newly elected officials to open up the budget for the year that they did not help plan.  There are two reasons that I did not attempt this process. 1) I have admitted to you my current ignorance on budgeting so I felt that I could add nothing to what the previous Council put together. 2) I would have had to have the support of the rest of the council, at least the majority, to make it happen and that wouldn't have happened.  If you look at the meeting notes from January when the budget was voted on you will find I abstained from voting.  I was not going to support something to which I had no input, nor was I going to vote against the efforts of my colleagues.    

3. Delmont purchased and upgraded the Pump-Station to the tune of $1 Million before I was on Council.  Was this in the best interest of our Borough?  I am not going to attempt to second guess this decision.  My only criticism of it is there should have been a Master Plan for our community that listed this possibility and included a capital expenditure item line to better plan this massive, for our small town, financial endeavor.

4.  The Delmont Sewage system is over 20 years old.  There are no capital improvement plans in a Master Plan that took into account the increasing maintenance costs over the years it has been in service.  Delmont's Capital Improvement Budget only has two line items; 1) Boiler and 2) Wheeled vehicles.  I do not think this is efficient and a Master Plan for our community would not have allowed this inefficiency to go unchecked.

5.  When I took office two payments were due on pump station. One for $87,327.00, and the final one for $21,578.00.  The Council voted to take out another $50,000 Tax Anticipation Loan and even borrowed $34,000.00 from the Shield's farm account and was even considering another $50,000 Tax antipation loan.  Did I like voting in favor of these options.  No, but I felt I had no choice.  It would look really dumb of me not to support methods to pay for items directly related to my responsibilities.

This is the most relevant facts that I can think of for background information.  I have decided to break up the information.  I don't want the posts to become so long that the reader doesn't take the time to finish it.  More tomorrow.

Attended Webinar "The Benefits of an Effective Planning Commission" by PA State Association of Boroughs Today

It is an eye opening experience when one is exposed to how things are suppose to be done, verses how things are actually carried out. I will be the first person to admit that "textbook" solutions will not always work in the real world; however, the textbook approach and Delmont's current practices are so far apart no wonder that our Planning Commission doesn't feel like they are a vital part  of Delmont's future and they have nothing to do.

What are the major deficiencies in the way Delmont's Planning Commission as I see them so far based on what I learned. 1) Delmont Council does not support the efforts of the Planning Commission at all.  This may sound harsh but a) The Planning Commission is not given any funding in the current budget. b) There is no mandate from Council that Planning Commission members receive the most basic of training to learn their jobs. c)  Council has not provided the Planning Commission the most rudimentary of the basic tools to fulfill their role. ( Note:  I need to research further the extent of our subdivision Regulations and Standards for creating Community Assets;our Zoning Ordinances;The extent that Delmont has incorporated the Municipal Planning Code: and, if Bylaws exist for the Planing Commission) For example, We do not have a Comprehensive Plan and the only Capital Improvement Budget Items the Borough currently has listed are 1) Boiler and 2) Wheeled Vehicle.  Most government entities that have a Plan include such items as Storm Sewers, Sanitary Sewers, Fire Equipment, Parkland Purchases,Road improvements, municipal building repairs and others. Currently, we look at most of these areas on an annual basis. d) I am not sure that our Planing Commission has a set of bylaws for consistency that clearly outline the Governing body's expectations for the Commission.  Finally, Government bodies that take Planning Commissions seriously usually have one or two elected officials who are also on the commission.

Here is something to think about in regards to the proposed Shield's Farm project.  Planning Commissions are suppose to have the municipality's demographics and trends.  This information is to be taken into account in decisions. (I am not sure about Delmont's information, but I am going to research this as well)  Major trends discussed in PA demographics suggest 1&2 person households are the fastest growing household types.  The number of households with children is decreasing and the number of childless households is increasing.  If these trends are true in Delmont, is increasing the number and type of baseball fields in our community really the best use for our town's most valuable resource?

Well, I am going to end this post here.  I have a number of questions to send to our solicitor in an e-mail based on what I have learned.  But before I go, what are some actions that can be taken?  1)  Personally, I am going to get answers to all the points mentioned in this post.  2)  I am going to get a copy of the Municipal Planning Code.  3)  I have acquired all the Ordinances of Delmont and want to read them all, but will concentrate on the ones pertaining to planning. 4)  I will continue working with my ad visors on Delmont Community Out reach.  5) I will research the possibilities of bringing other planning commission trainers into our area.

What can all citizens of Delmont do? 1) Encourage all members of Council to take the Planning Commission Seriously. 2) Persuade Council to appoint some elected officials to the planning commission.  3) Get serious about using the consultant and Develop a Comprehensive Plan for Delmont. 4) Encourage council to possibly consider paying the planning commission a small steepen 5) Encourage Council to pay more attention to Capital Expenditures and include Planning objectives. 6) Develop groups and start discourse about what you want your community to be like 75 years or more in the future and  work to the end.

I had to take great pause at mentioning 75 years in the future, because I started thinking back when I was a child and placed some items in the time capsule that was buried,  How very different Delmont was back then.....How many historical treasures were lost.....I can't help thinking that a Comprehensive Plan could have preserved that.  And....... I can't help thinking how much Delmont could change again until the time capsule is opened in I believe it will be about 17 more years, perhaps to its determent if we continue to fail to plan for the future.

Salem Crossroads at a Major Crossroads

I titled this post using the historical name of Delmont, Salem Crossroads.  This is the perfect time to discuss this because: 1) There are positions opening up on the Planning Commission, 2) Delmont is soliciting proposals for Planing Consultants,and 3) There is a proposal to add another ball field to Shields Farm. 4) Delmont Council is going to discuss an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow the Library to develop the site that was acquired for the new building.

Delmont has a poor planning history which I have been informed is not uncommon for Boroughs our size.  However, just because something is common does not mean that it is an acceptable practice.  One of the key problems is very few people including members of our Planning Commission do not  understand the vital link between a Master Plan and Economic Development of a Community.  I am not making this statement as a criticism toward our Planning Commission because the are doing an excellent job considering the Council and the People of Delmont have not given them the necessary tools to carry out their mission effectively.  In fact after a conversation with one of the members of the Commission, I was left with the impression that he was not aware of how vital their work is to Delmont's future.  He said, " I am not sure how important our commission is because most of the developable land in Delmont has been developed." This statement could not be further from the truth, but it is understandable since they do not have a Master Plan to work from.  Our solicitor said at one time, "Oh, you could get a Master Plan if you wanted to spend $30,000"  I do not know how accurate that figure is but that amounts to about $1.39 per resident a year for the next 10 years. I picked 10 years because this is an accepted time frame for the "life" of a plan.  The last statement is not entirely true because a plan really is not to have an expiration date but is to be revised periodically in about 5 year increments.  There will be on going maintenance costs with any plan but none will touch the amount required for the initial plan.  The more though and information that goes into that the cheaper the minimal ongoing cost will be.  Furthermore, with a set plan in place the acquisition and eligibility for future grants and assistance will be.  As Carl Boyd mentioned at the last Council Meeting when he disbanded temporarily the property development committee that certain property issues that would have cost the Borough over $30,000 with absolutely no immediate benefit and questionable and vague future benefit. Note:  If any of my fellow Council members would say that this last statement is untrue or not fair then they have some information that I was not given.  When all the information that has been provided to me is considered, the statement is absolutely true.  I just want to concede that there may be information that was not shared with me.)

Delmont lost a historical society.  A historical landmark in Delmont lost a vital part of its structure.  If it wasn't for a group of brothers 33 years ago Delmont would have lost the property that has become the parklet.  There was a person who wanted to put a auto repair shop on that piece of property, but the group sold a much more valuable piece of commercial property at a loss so that that eye sore would not be part of the Delmont downtown landscape. These are all areas that are addressed in a Master Plan.

Recent history also sheds light on the importance of a Master Plan.  The issue about selling the Borough Building.  The conflict over the Speedway property.  Even Sewerage issues that we are having can be addressed by the Master Plan.

I mentioned that the Council is planning to change the zoning ordinance so that the Library can build on the property acquired for that purpose.  I am a strong support of the Library Project, I am just concerned about the unintended consequences of the way we are planning to proceed without a Master Plan.

As far as Shield's Farm is concerned,  I believe that ALL Development needs to stop until a Master Plan is developed and accepted.  The unintended consequences could be Delmont becoming the center for Little League Tournaments.Is this a bad thing?  Personally it would not be top on my list but more importantly than that this is not the reason that the reason that the Snyders and Ewings gave that property to the Borough.  I have stated before that I have first hand knowledge of the negotiations that made that land available for our community.  I have even talked to the daughter of Fred Ewing.  Her statement was that her dad probably wouldn't have minded "a ball field" on the property for children since he was a school teacher and loved children.  Well a definition of a ball field when he was alive and what has developed on the property are world's apart.  Now having spent time hunting with Herbert Snyder and Judge Snyder they would not want any ball fields on the property.  Judge Snyder's passion was trying to save the American Chestnut which unfortunately has become extinct.  He dedicated many acres of his farm property in Bedford to this passion and attempting to bring the Chestnut back.  Herbert and Judge Snyder were all about conserving and preserving nature and open space.  They were also very interested in  preserving farming ideals.

What now?  I have added two more persons to my personal advisory committee.  But the most important thing is we have to come together as a Borough and really decide what type of town we want into the future.  Citizens across all ages and demographics need to try to find the time to offer their input.  The Master Plan needs to connect with the values and visions of its citizens.  No one person is going to be 100% satisfied with everything that will end up making its way into the plan, and many personal ideas and visions will need to be compromised for the benefit of our future.  I am going to work at establishing out reach programs so every interested citizen is offered an opportunity to learn what goes into a plan and the benefits of planning.  Here is the first step  http://www.lincolninst.edu/education/online-education/  This Website offers free courses covering planning, zoning, and land use.  I have completed the first course myself to gain some of the basic understanding of these subjects.  The nice thing about a lot of these courses is they have segments of subject areas that are not dependent on the segments for understanding.  This allows people to pick and choose segments of interest and segments that can be fit into available time.

What is the alternative?  To continue in a hit or miss fashion that promises to cause conflict and dissent among the citizens of Delmont.  To remain ineligible for certain grants and funding.   To have our town develop in a hazard fashion.  We will eventually loose all the charm and beauty that has lead us to settle in Delmont.  We need to act now.  We have already lost some parts of our heritage that can never be replaced.  We can't afford to set by and watch our town develop and grow without the desires of all citizens who want to contribute to the future having a chance.

Thank you for the opportunity to serve you.  I can be reached at david4delmont@gmail.com.  My office phone is (724) 552-9531.
 

Council Meeting April 12, 2016

I was very pleasantly surprised and baffled by the outcome of the Bus Stop issue.  The agreement for the new agreement was sent to Council before I was sworn in as a council member.  The general attitude that I perceived from Council is, "Why should we pay when outsiders are using the service?" The political technique of tabling an issue is generally employed when you want to kill a motion without casting votes that could cause great discontent with a large portion of constituents.

I knew that parking was an issue, but at the meeting it being the only reason that the agreement was tabled was news to me.  It made it look like all the posts on social media and my blog post was a major over reaction by me.  It makes me feel like they may be trying to spin my demeanor as irrational and over the top.  It may be difficult with me to accept the image they are trying to create but the end result is the citizens of Delmont still have their bus stop for another year.  I hope that the majority of constituents realize that I will do whatever it takes to learn about an issue and if my actions appear "over the top" it is to fight for the issues that you tell me our important.  I remember very well the feeling of helplessness and frustration of not being listened to when I was sitting in the audience at Council Meetings.  The looks of total frustration and rejection to the point of not trying to approach Council for anything that I saw on several faces before being elected is burned into my memory and drives me to fight for what you want.  Going over the top is still not good enough for the Citizens of Delmont, but I will continue to do my best.

The garbage and recycling issue was a very hot topic at this meeting.  I am surprised how some of the members where giving the appearance of coming around to the will of many of the citizens of Delmont's demands.  There were three citizens who are against contracting with a single garbage/recycling pick up provider.  Two gave reasonable arguments that I truly empathized with and understood their position.  One of those almost mirrored exactly my personal hang up of being told who we must use for garbage. The third person just kept muttering, "Bull-shit! This is Bull-shit!" while walking around the meeting room.  I really wish this person would have expressed the reasons behind his conclusions.  It is hard as a Councilman to gain any useful insights from this type of comment.  Although, I fully empathize with the sentiments.  There is a lot of BS in politics, perhaps even more than other professions or daily activities.  Being on the sewer committee does add a different perspective on BS.  Well actually excrement of a  different type. In all seriousness, I appreciate the opinions of all those opposed and will continue to listen to the arguments against, but at this point I feel that Delmont will be best served by a curbside pick up recycling option.  I just hope that action will be taken.  I have learned that it is a better practice to watch what people do more so than what they say.  It is even better to find people whos' words and actions are in harmony.  The ultimate condition is one whose action and words are congruent in all settings.  I have not yet seen this in Delmont's situation, but I remain hopeful.  I have seen this integrity in officials in neighboring communities.  I admire and respect this integrity and will try to emulate it in my own behavior.

There are two other major happenings that deserve their own posts.  One is comming in next month's meeting to change the zoning ordnance so  that the Library can be built on the chosen piece of property.  I am for the Library in its proposed location, but t he method of changing the zoning causes me great concerns.  I will explain this in latter post.

After the executive meeting, we received some MS4 training.  The implications of the program will cost residents upwards of $5.00 month.  Now don't get nervous this is about 10-20 years out.  This is not a charge that I am looking forward to and it is not a charge I agree with.  I will write another post concerning this.

For those of you that have attended the meeting, thank you for cumming and participating in our government.  It is great to see so many citizens at the meetings.  If there is anything I can do for you, please e-mail me at david4delmont@gmail.com, or you could call me at (724) 552-9531.  I lso invite you to comment on anything I write in these blogs.  I will allow your comments to be posted even if they are in disagreement with what I write.  The only requirement is they be constructive and in good taste.

It is a pleasure serving you.

Bus Stop in Delmont in Danger

Yesterday, I made posts in the following Communities on FaceBook: Delmont, Franklin Regional, and Westmoreland County.  The purpose of the posts is to encourage residents that use the service to encourage Council to act and ensure continued service. I received some criticism for not telling "the whole" story.

There are two approaches for learning "the whole" story in Delmont Politics.  The first is to meet in Council Chambers and discuss individual perceptions of the issues and their effects on the community.  Many of us may feel like our perceptions are actually facts and have difficulty in understanding why the citizens of Delmont don't agree with the findings.  They just don't understand the "facts" behind the "whole story".

The second approach is to attempt to verify the information with any agencies that have insight then to actually go into the community and start talking with the citizens about their understandings of the issues and how their lives are affected by the decisions we are making on behalf of those who elected us to office.  The information in this post is from 1) Information from the Westmoreland County Transit Authority. 2) Talking to passengers and business people on April 8, 2016., and 3) Previous actions taken by Council.

Delmont's share is $1,190.00.  This portion goes toward grant matching for state and Federal programs.  According to my calculations( I am basing this on a Borough population of 2663) comes out to $0.037 a month per resident to have this service available.  Our share amount is $1,130 cheaper than a bill we paid for avoidable repairs.  It is 30x or more cheaper then a consideration that would have provided no immediate service benefit to our citizens.  I am not a spend thrift but to my thinking spending this small amount is a no brainer, but let me provide some additional information.

There are two routes that currently go through Delmont.  The 2F Route is the Latrobe to Pittsburgh Flyer.  In January this route ran for 20 days and had 4,922 passengers.  In February, due to Leap Year, it operated 21 days and had 5,076 passengers.  If the extra day is taken into account there is still a 4% increase in riders.

The second bus route through Delmont is 12  the Greensburg/New Kensington route.  January they had 568 passengers, and in February there were 752 Passengers.  Adjusting for Leap-Year there was still a 5% increase.

Here is where the math gets a bit fuzzy.  The WT (Westmoreland Transit Authority) knows 85% of those passengers on the 2F route board between Delmont and Murrysville.  That is approximately 216 passengers a day.  The problem is there is also a stop in Export and Murrysville.  It is unclear if WT's estimate is before the Murrysville pick up, or after the pick-up.  This is problematic for many of the members of council because they want the "hard" numbers of how many Borough residents are benefiting for the money the spent.

What I learned talking to riders.   There was a rider from Punxsutawney that riders come from Ligoner regularly.  Slickville is a common point of ridership,  Yes, I even talked to two Borough residents.  Now the day that I was there was a Friday and that is a low ridership day for the bus.  I only talked to five people from three buses. One of the riders has her nails down at the nail shop in the Central Hotel Building.

I stopped in Ianni's Pizza to ask them some questions.  Incidentally, one of the passengers that I talked to was walking out of Ianni's carrying a pizza home.  Ianni's was extremely busy.  The worker I talked to said the get a fair amount of business from riders of the bus.  She also informed me that she personally lives in the Crammer plant and that there are many people that live there that the bus is their sole source of transportation. 

WT offers 10 trip passes that range in price from $13.00 to $40.00 depending on how many zones a rider goes through.  The monthly pass ranges from $48.00-$144.00 again dependent on zone travel.  These fees are extremely reasonable if we consider the cost of fuel, parking, insurance, etc. of operating a vehicle.  In fact, if it wasn't for bus service many people couldn't afford to work.

Conclusions:
1.  A large number of non-Borough Residents use the service in Delmont.
2.  Many riders support local business.
3.  Enough Residents use the service to justify the minimal cost.
4.  Negative economic impacts of discontinuing service are far greater than spending the $1190 to keep them.

Perhaps if I act like I am opposed to spending the $1190 it would have a greater chance of passing in council, but you elected me to act in your best interests.  If you oppose the $1190 expense let ,me know.  

Recycling and Garbage in the Borough

Fellow Citizens,

I received an e-mail from a resident who has been doing research on bringing some type of recycling option to our community.  It would involve the Borough entering into an agreement with one of the local waste management companies to include curb-side recycling pick up. This would reduce the monthly refuse bill of the residents and provide money to the Borough based on the amount of the recyclables collected. 

I told her that I am open to the idea, but have two major reservations. 1)  I believe very strongly that it is an individual's right to choose their trash service provider.  Governments at all levels have forced entirely too many "choices" down our throats (health care, seat belt, social security and unemployment taxes, etc...). 2)  Unless proper provisions would be included the monies received would be payable to the Borough.  I would rather see a large portion of the proceeds go to Delmont Volunteer Fire Department and Delmont Lions Club for distribution.  The individuals in our Fire Department risk their lives every time the respond to a call. Furthermore, the are forced to take more time away from their families and other activities to engage in fund raising activities.  I don't think it is right that an organization that is so vital to the safety and economic vitality of our Borough seem to get the short end of the budget from Delmont officials.  I believe the Lion's Club should be the other recipient because the have over 25 years experience placing the funds from their recycling program into the hands of the organizations in Delmont that needed it.

As I told Becky,  I am here to serve you. I will not let my personal feelings about limiting an individuals choice interfere with supporting the imitative that she is proposing.  I think over-all the proposal will benefit the community.  It will require the passing of a resolution and I told her she may have a difficult time convincing the other members of council that this is a good option.

Our Council Meeting is next Tuesday at 7:00 PM at the Borough Office Building 77 Greensburg St.

Correction March 22, 2016

I received an e-mail from Patrick Varine  informing me of an error in my last Blog.  The park-let is being named for Rose Wigfield and not Mary Wigfield. He informed me that he was doing a story on Rose.  I am looking forward to reading it and learning who this woman was in our community.  I am grateful to Patrick for informing me of my factual error as well as taking the time to read the blog.

If any of you see mistakes in my blogs, please let me know.  If you disagree or agree that information is also welcome.  I am here to serve you and can be reached at david4delmont@gmail.com

March 8, 2016 Council Meeting Notes

There was a lot of emotion involved with the recycling issue.  It still upsets me personally that some of our elected officials insist on trying to hide behind Environmental initiatives.  On the flip side environmental issues have been highly political since the late 60's and early 70's resulting in the formation of the US Environmental Protection Agency.  There is still confusion that I do have a plan to get to the bottom of.  It is imperative that anyone who has a desire to serve the public accept accountability for their actions without blaming other state or federal agencies for their positions.  The public we serve has the right to know our true positions so they can informatively choose the people they want to represent them in elected government.

I was attacked by a councilwoman for saying that council pushed the decision through to end the use of Borough Land for Recycling.  Carl Boyd moved to set a departure date of all Lion recycling equipment land from the Borough Garage Property.  This action was necessary to make room necessary for the construction of a retention pond that is being paid foe by a grant.  He then made the motion to "end recycling".  Jim Bortz said that question could be tabled to latter.  However, Carl was adamant that it had to end now.  Becky Matesevac seconded the motion and it passed 4 to 2 with Debbie Jobe being absent.  Jim Bortz and myself were opposed. The token offer to try to find an alternative site was not made until after this vote.  This all happened at the February meeting.  I believe the facts as they transpired should be able to be recalled more than 30 days after the event.  My interpretation of this action was the Lions were railroaded because the second vote was not tabled for study and exploration but pushed through.  Everyone is free to interpret these actions as they wish, but this is why I specifically,  used the term railroaded and it was this expression that brought the angered response from Becky to me.

The Lions made a very good argument and there are a lot of grant opportunities available for recycling.  It would take research to determine if Council support would be needed to obtain the grants.I received a phone call from a long time resident who informed me that he would personally make a drive to continue recycling.  Thus resident is a member of the Lions as well as a former Borough official.

The way the "final decision" statement was delivered left me conflicted.  Being an elected official we must make decisions and some of the them are hard.  The actions that we may declare "final" are final only as long as the majority of those who made a particular decision are in a position to uphold it.  The beauty of a democracy is officials only serve at the will of those who entrust them to represent them in government.  It was stated that "change is good" I believe a more fundamental change to those who would be more receptive to the will of the Borough residents would exemplify the quote, "Change is Good"

This next comment I will probably take some heat on, but so be it.  The mayor asked, to name the park after a Mary Wigfield.  I will concede that the Mayor can name areas in the Borough anything she wants.  I also concede that naming can be a highly debatable issue.  Personally,  I believe that the naming of  places, buildings, monuments, etc should be of persons or organizations that have Historical Significance or have made major contributions to life in our Borough.  Perhaps there should be guidelines and/or a citizens committee that suggests names for consideration.  Forgive my ignorance but I have no personal knowledge of any historical significance or community involvement that would warrant the park let receiving her name.  I am doing more research on the historical aspect to see if I might have missed something from that perspective.  Off the top of my head some more appropriate names for the park let could be:  Joann Mook, Marjorie Ewing, Norman Hines, John Mook, Lion's Club, Rotary, Jim Davis, Monnis, Bash, Faulk, Paul Kerstein, or others.  The point is that names of places in communities should reflect important cultural ties to the community.

Again the rest of the Council is choosing to sit on the contract with Westmoreland County Port Authority.  This could effectively end Bus service in our Borough even after The United Church of Christ made great strides to alleviate the parking problem.  I urge all citizens that want bus service from Delmont to push the issue.  6 to 1 says it would be tabled yet again, if I attempted to bring it up. Although citizens of other communities may not be given a chance to speak, this would be the decision of Council President, I would encourage you to come to a Council Meeting if you use this service.
   

Training Update

This post is to keep you updated in my commitment to you to gain the necessary information to make informed decisions for our Borough.

Attended the Public Works Management Course by the PA State Association of Boroughs on March 10, 2016.  It was a full day seminar and provided great information along wit some money saving suggestions.

On March 15, 2016 there was a half day session on 2016 Ethics scheduled.  Ironically, it was postponed due to lack of interest.

Spent 6 hours 27 minutes studying Lincoln Institute Comprehensive Planning Course.

Spent 7 hours 15 minutes on FEMA training.

Response to Radon Question

I apologize for the length of time since the last post, there have been many activities with kids, and life stuff that has been occupying time.  A few days have even been occupied in training for the position of Councilman as well.

Many years ago, I was certified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Radon Measurement Proficiency Program Certification #139806T.  This was a vigorous process that required much study and a test but was required of anyone wishing to conduct radon testing in homes or businesses, or  be involved with radon mitigation strategies such as sub-slab depressurization.

Radon is the second largest cause of lung cancer in the United States after smoking.  Delmont, because of our geological substructure structure, has higher than normal radon levels.  It is not just Delmont, but Pennsylvania as a whole.  In fact, Radon was originally discovered in the Eastern portion of Pennsylvania.  I think it was at the Susquehanna nuclear power plant, one of the nuclear power plants out east, workers were arriving to start their shifts and setting off the radiation detectors at the power plant.  These were the same workers who went home with no radiation detected at the end of their shifts.Naturally, this phenomenon was alarming to the nuclear regulators and industry because the needed to find the source.  It was discovered that radon, a naturally occurring,  odorless, colorless, tasteless gas was responsible.  Radon is produced in natural decay of uranium and has a half-life of 3.84 days.  The danger from radon is the alpha particle emission in the decay process.  Although, the alpha particle can be stopped with a sheet of paper, it becomes dangerous when inhaled and damages the soft tissue of the lungs.  Radon can also diffuse into water and be re-released into the air when the water turns into a mist, like in a hot shower for example.  Radon gas will follow natural openings in the ground and buildings.

The question I was asked is, "If there was nuclear waste on the speedway property 1) wouldn't it raise the radon levels all over Delmont, and 2) Wouldn't they test for radon before the property was transferred?  In response to question 1,  It is highly unlikely that a potential localized source would find open pathways underground that would diffuse throughout the Borough.  Equal distribution of the diffused gas would be an impossibility.  I would say buildings in a close proximity would have a higher probability of experiencing an increased radon level.  However, it depends on the composition of the potential waste.  It would have to be known at what level of decay the daughter particles are in as well as the state of original substance disposed. (U236,, U238, Plutonium).  More important is determining where the waste is and what it is.

The answer to the second question is much simpler.  No.  Radon testing is conducted when buildings are involved in the transfer of real estate. If there is radio active waste on the site, and the location of the buildings would be constructed in close proximity to the waste, or adjacent to openings the gas can move through, I would bet the radon level in that building dwarf any readings in other buildings in Delmont.  It could produce a harmful level of radon, especially for those exposed to it all day.  Trying to test for radon in an open setting is counter-productive because it is a naturally occurring gas and it is inside concentrations that increase risk.

I would urge all citizens of Delmont to test for radon especially if you have small children.  The higher levels of radon contamination are generally in the lower floors, and basement.


PA DEP information   http://www.dep.pa.gov/Business/RadiationProtection/RadonDivision/Monitoring/Pages/Publications.aspx#.Vu1dLpwrKUk

US EPA information    https://www.epa.gov/radon

March 3, 2016 Update

Sorry it has been longer than I like since reporting in to you.  Council activities have been a bit slow or not as urgent as some family activities.

I have e-mailed letter of concern to John Rusty Young of Speedway detailing concerns with the Kunkle property they purchased.  If you are interested in reading it, it can be found at https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108679940/Speedway%20Letter.doc.  If you have trouble downloading you can request a copy by e-mailing me at david4delmont@gmail.com.

I realize that there has been some discussion of this in the media.  Here is my overall reply to any statements.  If you are not a resident of the Borough of Delmont, I really don't care what opinion you have about issues taking place in our Borough.  I was warned in Newly Elected Borough Officials Training that their are individuals who like to cross local government boundaries to stir up meetings and other government activities.  The instructors stressed the fact that non-residents should receive no time at the local meetings or the important business of meetings would not be accomplished.  If people choose to comment in public newspapers without all facts or available information that is certainly their Constitutional Right.  I simply take solace in the quote from Samuel Clemons (Mark Twain) concerning such situations: " Tis better to remain silent and appear foolish, then to open your mouth and remove all doubt."  Ignorance speaks for itself.  I do wish to say that there are exceptions to me listening from people who do not live in the Borough of Delmont.  They are as follows: 1)  I will listen to any citizens of governmental entities that are in discussions with the Borough of Delmont for Cooperative Governmental Agreements.  2)  I will listen to anyone who owns property in the Borough but chooses to reside elsewhere.  3)  I will listen to anybody who has a place of business within the Borough. 4)  I will listen to employees of companies within the borough. 5) I will listen to anybody who uses services within the borough (Westmoreland County Transit customers).  6) I will listen to anyone who is directly affected by descions of Delmont Council.  Clearly, if you are 2.1 miles away that doesn't include you.

I will mention and encourage all residents to vote in the March 15, 2016 special election for District 57 State Representative which was vacated when Representative Krieger became Judge Krieger..   There is a good chance that candidate Eric Nelson will attend the Council Meeting of March 8, 2016. His opponent Linda Lezzi attended last months meeting.

I have received some comments about the potential of radio active waste being on the old Kunkle property and effects on Radon levels in the Borough.  I will address Radon in my next blog in a couple of days.  I have registered for the following activities from Pennsylvania State Association of Boroughs: 1) Public Works Management 2) 2016 The Ethics Act, and 3) 2016 Annual Conference.  I truly hope my $440.00 in this segment of training activities will make me a better Councilman for you.

Delmont Needs You

The whole purpose of today's post is to encourage any reader who may be interested in running for Delmont Council to take action.

I posted on Facebook today a post to encourage citizens of Delmont who are interested in real change in our community to act NOW.  One reason that incumbents stay incumbents is because of the process of getting on the ballot.  There will be some seats opening up on Council in November.  However if you want to be on that ballot you have to go through the primary.  I had to navigate the whole process all by myself and it can be intimidating.   The first question to ask yourself is why would you want to run for Delmont Council?  Here is a list of reasons that I came up with.  If any thing here is a true concern of yours please consider running.  1)  You don't feel that Delmont Council adequately represented your views in the Speed Way debate. 2) You don't think the Council should sell the School building. 3) You are not happy with the recent property purchases of Council. 4) You do not agree with the way that Council is spending you tax dollars. 5) You want Delmont to keep bus Service. 5) You aren't happy with the secrecy that surrounds Shield's Farm.  6) You expressed your concerns to Council. but you don't feel like you have been heard. 7)  Council abandoning the Lion's recycling efforts upsets you.

I could really use your help in changing my 6 to 1 odds.  But what do you have to do?  Go to the County Election Burough  and get a petition.  You will need at least 10 signatures, 9 if you include mine from the party you wish to run.  You are entitled to a CD that contains all the information of the registered voters in your party.  There is a document that needs to be notarized.  You can have this document notarized for free a couple doors down from the Election Board.  If you can get the proper documents feel free to contact me, I would be glad to get them for you from the Court House or help you complete the proper forms to appear on the primary ballot.  You have to win the primary to appear on November's ballot.  If you want my help contact me at david4delmont@gmail.com.

Please help Delmont and help me change the 6 to 1 odds. The community will thank you.

Council Meeting February 9, 2016

Last night's meeting was fairly long due to monies that are due for different projects and the fact that we needed to take out a tax anticipation loan until we start receiving monies again.  Including "borrowing" $38.664.88 from the Shield's Farm Account. Leaving $100.  I maybe mistaken and there might have been $99.00 more transferred leaving $1.00.  It is never good when Peter steals from Paul, but since I have very little idea what is going on at the Farm,  I can't determine a clear picture of possible dangers in such action.

I need to call a spade a spade.  My mind last night was preoccupied with the draft letter that I wrote to Speedway concerning the high probability that there is waste, possibly radioactive waste on the site they wish to build.  This issue has been weighing on me for a very long time.  It is the information that I said in a previous blog that may be giving me more gray hair.  This preoccupation coupled with the length of  the meeting had me distracted from other issues like recycling by the Lion's Club which I will address next.

In my opinion it is despicable that Councilman Boyd tried to use the MS4 issue for an excuse to get the Lion's to move or quit recycling in Delmont.  The area where the Lion's recycling materials are located must be relocated (at least temporarily) so that a retaining pond can be built in the stream as part of a grant that Delmont received.  The recycling issue is much bigger than just our small community.  A major problem right now is the economy is in a slow down and there is no current paper money in the activity.  A major problem is very few people are able to think ahead and convert the future costs to quality of life, costs of remediation, loss of usable land (that has been dedicated to disposal facilities) into today's dollar.  It is a sad state of affairs when it is cheaper, in some cases, to buy a whole new printer than to replace ink.  What happens to all the junk printers?  I have many moral and ethical issues when it comes to Environmental considerations.  I believe in letting the free market work; yet, there is no such thing in reality.  I also believe in smaller less governmental regulation and more responsibilities for the individual.  Unfortunately, it seems that are educational system is encouraging youth to find someone or something to blame instead of teaching the virtue of responsibility for one's own actions.  The only issue that I can see is physical objects making their way into the stream (ie; cans, storage containers, plastic, etc).  The idea of any illicit discharge in any quantity of concern is totally ludicrous.  That is my opinion based on 15+ years experience in environmental issues and interactions with Federal,State, and local authorities from all over the United States.  The comment made about soap being a concern to DEP showed that an understanding of the issues just doesn't exist.  This comment may have had some humor in a different context but was totally inappropriate as most of my counterparts were wanting to be done with recycling.  This stance shows the ignorance of elected officials.  Personally, I commend the members of the Lion's Club for their foresight and concern with the well being of future residence of Delmont.  I told members of the Lion's leadership that I was going to look into a real solution with Waste Management, EPA, and DEP.  The Lions giving up on Recycling in Delmont will have a huge negative impact on Delmont.  Here is a short list; 1) Different organizations not benefiting from the financial as well as the camaraderie in working together for the good of Delmont.  Yes, I know there is no money now, but that will change.  2) The residents of Delmont will be experiencing an increase in cost for trash removal,  3) It saves landfill space for the future.  4) If you think that regulatory agencies will ignore recyclables in regular trash when the prices go up guess again.  Either residents, borough, or both will be paying some type of fine for improper disposal.  5) Once a service goes away the increased costs and the difficulty in regenerating interests makes it very hard to bring back if possible at all.  

There is a lot more to discuss about the speed way issue and other challenges facing our small borough, but I need to get some of my thoughts out there for your consideration.

February 2, 2016

Sunday I spent a large portion of my day reading over the MS4 requirements and the Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Technical manual.  I feel like I have a fairly decent understanding of the program and its objectives.  I contacted the Westmoreland County District because I want to gain a better idea of the Borough's role in the over-all water quality of the area.  From the experience that I have had working with EPA and State Government Regulatory Agencies, I was surprised that regulators would target a 1.1 Sq.mile Borough with a population just north of 2,000 for a MS4 permit.  I am getting a better understanding but still have some field work to do before developing a complete understanding.  I truly hope that fellow council members use me on the aspects of the MS4 permit that their committee overseas.  In any event I may get an opportunity to work with the District and possibly helping with the County Ordinance even if Delmont Council doesn't want to utilize me in this area.

We had our first Sewer committee meeting/  One of the big concerns for Delmont is storm water infiltration and the possibility of overflow at the pump station.  Regulatory agencies frown at over-flow and could take action.  However, as a community we have been improving and we are continuing to look for more ways to improve.  One of the big problems is there has not been enough education about using our sewers more effectively.  Sewer education my sound dirty and boring.  However, it can save you money personally as well as the Borough money.  If you aren't interested in saving the Borough money, please remember that Borough money is actually your money funneled a different way.  I will be putting together information on our sewer system and scheduling a public gathering.  I will try to use the Library or the Borough meeting room.  The meeting is probably 30-60 days out as I asked our Public Works department to gather some photos of the issues that are pressing to our system.

Please remember that next Tuesday, February 9th is the next council meeting.  The new meeting room is bigger than our old room.  Looking forward to seeing you there.

Weekly Update January 28, 2016

There is a lot going on with an issue that I am in and researching.  It has given me a few more gray hairs, if that is possible.  Not much I can discuss at this time, but I am planning on making the rest of the council aware of it at February meeting.

The training has not been rescheduled as of yet.  I have read over all the materials and it has given me some ideas of things to look into as far as our local volunteer fire department is concerned.

There is suppose to be a meeting of the sewer committee soon.  I will try to contain my excitement.

Sorry there is not a lot to talk about.  It is important to keep you informed.  It is my understanding that February's Council Meeting, still in the Borough Building, will be moved to the area where the Insurance Agency vacated.  This should be stated in the printed notice, but in case it is over-looked I thought I would mention it here.  There will be signs posted to guide you to the proper location.

Remember you can always contact me at (724) 552-9531  or by e-mail: david4delmont@gmail.com

Training Day 2

I was up at 3:30 AM shoveling out to attend the second day of New Borough Official Training.  One of the Instructors stayed at the training location and the other lives real close.  The way they were acting we would more than likely have training today.  I checked the website there was no update.  It wasn't until I arrived at the training site that I learned that Harrisburg cancelled the training at about 7;00 AM.  Too bad I was already on the road.  This training was extremely important to me so I wanted to make sure that I got it.  They will be rescheduling a make-up.

I did make many good contacts yesterday, including someone that I have asked to join my personal advisory group.  He is a nuclear expert.  It was interesting to learn that there are some boroughs that are worse off than we are.  It was even more surprising to learn that some councils were engaged in practices that aren't congruent with the way things should work in local governments.  That is why this training is so important.

I have learned a lot about funding fire departments and local governments responsibilities.  I want to check into more about pass through funding were the State gives the Borough X number of dollars specifically to be passed directly to the local Fire Department.  I don't remember seeing any mention of this on the budget sheets.

So much to learn.

This is a Big Weekend

 I am very excited as Basic Training for newly elected borough officials, sponsored by the Pennsylvania Association of Boroughs, starts tomorrow.  I am very grateful to my lovely wife who is taking a personal day to care for the kids.  I am hopeful to learn many things that will help me serve you better to the extent possible in the current Borough political climate.  I may have some exciting news to share about my personal association with the PA Association of Boroughs, but I will wait to see how that possibility plays out before saying more.

The training will take place tomorrow and Saturday in Greensburg.  One of the things that excites me the most is will not be two days of sewage.  This might come as a slight disappointment to those who wish to keep me sewers of Delmont, but they will just have to adjust.  I am sure the information will help me with other crap that I have to deal with.

On The Streets of Delmont

There were two areas I wanted to visit today.  The first was up to the Borough Garage property.  I wanted to see the recycling area as well as the "storm drain" entrance that the "illicit discharges" from  recycling would enter.  I also wanted to visit the work site on Christy Road were the stream bank work was completed.

It is amazing what one can learn while buying hoagies from the Boy Scouts on the street corner.  Actually, today it was buying from the mothers of the Boy Scouts as they had some rock climbing outing and yesterday was the only time they could get out.  I would strongly encourage all residents to support our local Scout Troop.  The service the render for Apple Festival,  Pilgrimage, other special community days, serving at some local church functions, and providing service projects to the community is an asset to us all. Sorry, for the slight excursion from the main point.  I talked to a resident of the Community for 48 years.  She asked me about the Bus Stop in Delmont.  Apparently, she is an elder in one of the local churches and after discussions were willing to let bus commuters use the church parking lot and alleviate the street parking concerns of last year.  She was told she would need to contact the attorney of Westmoreland Transit Authority to make the offer to them.  She has and has not heard anything back.  Before, I was elected to Council I attended many meetings.  At one of those meetings I remember the Council talking about trying to move the bus stop out of Delmont and to Export. In all honesty, I am not a bus user and their is so much other stuff going on in this town that I put a personal higher priority on.  Briefly my position is the Residents of Delmont deserve to have a local bus stop.  A early morning commuter population offers income potential for local business who would choose to capitalize on it, or entry of a local entrepreneur to fill the current void.  Secondly, it is always easier to forfeit public services than to get them back once lost.  Too bad the same can't be said for taxes.  It seems that temporary taxes have a way of never going away.  I am not referring to any local taxes I know of, but rather to taxes in general.  If a bus stop in Delmont is important to you please let me know.  Your concerns will cause me to re prioritize the issues that I believe are important.

The information that I gathered from the visit to the borough property and recycling area is as follows so far.  Please keep in mind that I have only read about 200 of the 800 pages plus I found so far is I have not found anyway that the recycling is impacted by MS4 at its current location.  There were some things that appeared to me to be a bigger concern than the possible contamination of rain water ruin-off by the recycling.  This is preliminary and I want to do more research as well as talk to our engineer about his interpretation.

The area where the stream bank project was completed looks pretty good.  The Engineers must have chosen a very good excavator as the resident of the property hired the excavator to fix-up his property after the Borough project was complete.  There are many sewer and water issues in this area that will require more attention at a different time.

Finally, I would ask all residents to try to work out differences amongst themselves.  If the Borough Ordinance Officer pays you a visit, it does not necessarily mean that someone has reported you to the Borough.  Our Ordinance Officer does drive around town and make his own observations.  If your neighbor's activities is adversely affecting your enjoyment of property or living conditions talk to them and tell them your concerns.  If it is a known ordinance violation tell them and give them a chance to abate the problem, and if they don't tell them that you will report them and tell them the ordinance in question.  This should prevent any hard feelings and it lies the whole situation wide upon and on the table.  Try to resolve your own issues, believe me you wouldn't want the current sitting council to mediate differences. Life is too short and our town is too small not to get along.

My Personal Advisory Group

I had dinner with a gentlemen tonight who has agreed to help me in my efforts.  At this time he wishes to remain anonymous.  He has given me a new energy and hope with ideas to approach issues such as Speedway, Shield's Farm, and the Policies and Procedures currently in place within our Borough. I am not sure how many others I will be able to get to help.  I am thinking no more than six. They will have the option to be introduced on the Blog or to remain confidential.  I promise if I report in this blog that a person has joined my advisory board that a person exists in fact.  I am not going to make things up for effect or to exaggerate the capabilities that I am building through others' expertise.  The proof in their existence will become known through my actions in service to you.  I mean after all I have been deemed appropriate for Sewage duty only.

One more quick comment about the enthusiasm I received from tonight's meeting.  It expired a slogan I may adopt for any political activities I may wish to engage in. 6 to 1 I might be unable to get anything officially done, but boy will I have fun!  What does this mean for those of you that have elected me to this office?  1)  I will do anything possible to help you that is moral, ethical, and legal that 6 to 1 can achieve.  2)  You will know more about the issue and actions of Borough activities in the last 10 years.3) I will give a whole new meaning to games in politics.  I do not mean the underhanded political maneuvering that phrase could imply, but rather more fun and uplifting activities like "Pin the tail on the Jackass".  No, I am not referring to mascot of the Democratic Party, but rather the bipartisan beasts that can affect any political organization.

Meeting January 12, 2016

Tonight's meeting ran very well.  The meeting was actually conducted by a council member Andrew Shissler.  The Solicitor and President were absent.

I passed out the 20 year old lost agreement from Shield's Farm. I was not interrupted; yet, I am still going to make a post a video about the Farm on You tube and run it through this blog spot.  I wanted to have it done before I passed out the document, but my voice is not cooperating fully this week.  It is imperative that town take back control of this valuable asset.  I will have a lot more to say about all the properties the Borough owns.

It is funny but council is still entertaining the idea of renovating the borough garage building.  I had thought the issue was dead when it was decided that the borough building would not be sold.  What caught my attention was a drawing of the proposed renovation that is part of the building.  The drawing was made by official looking software.  I did not recognize the name of the drawer, or the checker. My concern was the credentials of the "architect"  and the checker.  I recognized the checker as TJ the chief of police.  In the 5 years I spent in the engineering department of an aircraft instrument manufacturer and the 2 years as an Environmental Safety Inspector on construction sites I learned that only licensed architects or structural building engineers could draw plans and usually the person checking the plan had to have the same credential.  I was assured by Carl Boyd that the drawing was only for rough conceptual ideas.  TJ wanted to make sure that I realized that he was asked to provide the drawing to council and he did not generate the idea.  For some strange reason he thought I would spread rumors that he wanted a new office.  I am not in the business of spreading rumors.  One of the reasons I have decided to Blog my impressions, and positions is so rumors aren't started about me.  You can come right to the source read it first hand and don't even to make a Sun Shine Act request.

Bills I questioned: 1) Grate Repair $779.08 to EJ USA.  2) $1014.44 to Muray Auto Electric for repair to Borough Truck.  That seems a bit high to me I may still ask to see the actual bill.

To the Constituent that wanted to know total costs of the Stream bank on Christy Road $290.28 Engineering.  Material $10,000 and the wall was $13,850. Another note worthy event was the $5100 hoist from pump station sewer contract to put a hoist on a borough truck.  It will be interesting to see if the total cost will be more or less than the $5100 reduction.

One of my biggest concerns is recycling in Delmont may have to end under the MS4 protocol and the location of borough property to a stream.  The Lions club is a very importany organization within our community and recycling is a big fund raiser for them.  More needs to be determined about this regulation.  No alternatives were given at this time.

Why so adversarial?

I am sorry it took so long to respond to these questions asked to me a couple of days ago.  I was asked, "Why are you being openly adversarial with the rest of council?  Are you just trying to make a name for yourself."

These questions really hit me hard, but if these impressions of me exist in the community the must be addressed.  My nature is one of cooperation in achieving worthwhile goals. I learned and exercised this value when I was appointed by Governor of Kansas to Serve on a technical review committee, spending three years working for Environmental Protection Agency subcontractor ironing out issues between Federal and state agencies, serving as President of Delmont Rotary Club serving as President of Greensburg Toastmaster's Club, and leading to the Distinguished President Award.  I have a very long history of relationship building with diverse groups.  The adversarial position was thrown at me and I will explain the short history in a minute.

In fact it is my goal to borrow Rotary International's Four Way Test and apply it to the most practical extent possible.

THE FOUR-WAY TEST

Of the things we think, say or do

* Is it the Truth?

* Is it fair to all concerned?

* Will it build goodwill and better friendships?

* Will it be Beneficial to all concerned?

Clearly an Adversarial position violates point two.  At least on the surface.  So how did we get there?  It all started before I took office. I had an interest in filling the Mayor's seat when Gail Senchez left our town.  I consulted Jim Davis a former councilman and Mayor of Delmont.  He told me that the council wouldn't appoint me to mayor, but should start out on council to see if I liked it.  I had another friend tell me that in a borough setting that Mayor was sort of the public persona of the community and that real legislation and borough operations where via Council.  I confided in the President of the council my interest, he lead me to believe that it was a democratic process and there was nothing he could do.  In other words he lied to me.  I mentioned in another post how there was no candidate of interest for the longest time and all of a sudden at the meeting where I thought they were going to interview and hear from interested persons they already had a person present with affidavit in hand to be sworn in.   Then there was the primary election where they used every means possible to keep me out of office.  There was all day campaigning and even a magnet was made who to vote for, obviously I wasn't on it.  In the 35 years that I have lived in this area I never witnessed such a thing, but everyone has the right to  express their opinions.  You the public voted me in anyways.  These actions did not encourage my adversarial approach it just taught me that my chances of getting anything down are slim and none.

So what actions have ignited my emotion and passion to confront the issues head on?

1)  In council meeting before I was elected I observed how citizens with concerns were treated.  In my opinion there concerns were not even validated much less listened to.  I am basing this on body language I observed: a) not making eye contact b) leaning back instead of forward. c) arms clasped behind head while sucking on a lollipop.  The majority of council members looking at each other instead of speaker.

2)  Talking to citizens to feel that it is a waste of time to attend meetings because the representatives that they elected will no longer listen to them anyway.

3) Individual citizens loosing property materially and/or aesthetically by highly questionable processes.  These three points go against everything I believe in as to what a democratic society should be.and how a government of the people, by the people, and for the people ought to function. And this fellow Delmontians is what gets the patriotic part of my blood boiling thus producing what may be perceived as a frontal aggressive (adversarial) attack on fellow members of council.

Believe it or not there is one benefit in using an adversarial tone with any individual that may have narcissistic tendencies wherever you may find one. A perceived adversarial attack is interpreted as a direct threat to power and the response will be more emotive than logical and the responses will not be filtered.  Consequently, information intended to kept may accidentally be released.

The short answer is an adversarial environment is not one that I chose to be in but is what is presented to me so I will make the best use of it I can for the good of the borough, and I have no desire in making a name for myself.  I just want a community where all the citizens can enjoy the Rights and Duties of a democratic society equally.  I place where my kids can grow up safe and participate as active citizens in the governmental process.           

  

Pay for Service Education Etc...

Long before I was elected to office I talked to a friend who has been involved with politics on the municipal level for many years.  A suggestion he made to me was to donate any pay for the position to local charities to enforce the idea that you are giving your time to your community and you are not interested in any financial benefits the office may hold.  In other words show your constituents that the only reason you took the office was to serve and make the community a better place to live.  This was my original intent: in fact, I am going to donate a portion to the 200 club that Delmont Library is using for the building project.  I am going to donate something to our Fire Department as well because they are an often overlooked major asset in our community.

I have since learned of an educational program for local officials through the Pennsylvania Association  of Boroughs.  I have decided to complete a program that ends with a designation as a Certified Borough Official (CBO).  I believe that completing this program is the least that I can do to serve you to the best of my ability and truly serve with knowledge in addition to fidelity.   I estimate this will cost $1250 in fees and approximately $700 in traveling.  I want the citizens of the borough to know that this money is going to come from my personal funds and no requests for reimbursement will be made of council although local governments often pay for these types of activities.  The reason I made this decision is as follows: 1)  This investment is small compared to the duties the citizens of Delmont have entrusted to me.  2)  Opponents may try to twist my wanting to attend these classes and conferences as being a fiscally irresponsible spend thrift. 3)  I will have totally control over what activities I attend. 4) Ignorance enjoys company so even if I should have considered seeking reimbursement the vote would be 6-0 since I would have to abstain from voting since this would be perceived as benefiting me only.

The overall effectiveness of training and education depends on mindset of those who attending them.  When a person pays to attend these activities they have 100% of their own skin in the game.  You will be able to judge the effectiveness of the training based on my performance in office.  You will have to judge leniently for the first year as I am starting my term as a lame-duck because I will vote and act with fidelity toward the people of Delmont and not the "ruling cliche".

An interesting note for those of you who missed October 2015 Council meeting.  The total amount that I am willing to personally invest is still less than the $2500 you paid to have exhaust systems fixed on police vehicles because some officers find it inconvenient to drive around to a road where the cars will not scrape bottom.

I was telling a constituent today about what could be considered in the vernacular "the dog and pony" show of the reorganization meeting last night.  I told her that the first thing that I did after being sworn in was nominated a set of people that I believe would be better for our town to the office of President and Vice President of Council.  She was surprised because the current President has been around so long that she didn't know the position was open to any type of change.

If you want more information on how local governments are suppose to work in PA, including our borough, you can download a citizens guide at https://www.dropbox.com/s/zlpc42cyrjnc2sv/Citizens_Guide_2010.pdf?dl=0

 I went to the planning commission meeting tonight to meet the commissioners and try to get an idea about how this process is working in our borough.  There are many challenges, but I have enough to learn by concentrating on what I need for borough governance.